Skip to the content.

🛡️ SAST vs DAST Scans

These are two common approaches to application security testing.


1️⃣ SAST – Static Application Security Testing

Definition:

SAST analyzes source code, bytecode, or binaries without running the application to find security vulnerabilities.

Key Points:

How it works:

Developer writes code → SAST tool scans code → Reports vulnerabilities → Fix code

Pros:

Cons:

Example tools: SonarQube, Checkmarx, Fortify, Veracode.


2️⃣ DAST – Dynamic Application Security Testing

Definition:

DAST analyzes a running application by simulating attacks to find security weaknesses.

Key Points:

How it works:

App deployed → DAST tool attacks endpoints → Finds vulnerabilities → Report → Fix

Pros:

Cons:

Example tools: OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite, AppSpider, Netsparker.


3️⃣ SAST vs DAST – Quick Comparison

Feature SAST DAST
Stage Early (development) Late (running app)
Testing method Static (code review) Dynamic (runtime)
Access to code Yes No
Types of issues found Code flaws, SQLi, XSS Runtime flaws, auth issues, misconfigurations
False positives Higher Lower (more realistic)
CI/CD integration Easy Possible, but slower

4️⃣ Combined Approach (Best Practice)


💡 Analogy: